Windows vs mac unicode mac os x#

These are usually the most reliable since they typically work in all the environments, if Tibetan Unicode will work at all. There are, however, some Open Type fonts (Jomolhari-ID and the newer Qomolangma fonts) that have been specially adapted with a trick to work in Mac applications. In addition, there are very frustrating situations where the AAT fonts won't even show up in the font menu for a software application, even if you can see the 'font group' to which you might have assigned them. However, there are some exceptions where Mac software will work with Open Type fonts but not with AAT fonts. In Mac LION OS, most typical software programs will work only with the AAT fonts (Kokonor, Kailasa) and not with the Open Type fonts (Tibet Machine Uni, Microsoft Himalayan, Jomolhari). Earlier Mac operating systems have only partial support for Tibetan Unicode.Īs explained below, there are two types of Unicode Tibetan fonts - Open Type and AAT, with Windows historically focusing on supporting the former and Mac supporting the latter. However, limitations persist for Tibetan in the software, which often does not work properly with Unicode Tibetan despite the systems support. Scope of support includes full Unicode Tibetan block coverage and stacks for transliterated Sanskrit plus some contemporary Chinese phoneticizations.

Windows vs mac unicode mac os x#

Mac OS X 10.5.0 (Leopard) onwards comes with full Unicode Tibetan support in the base install, including two fonts (Kokonor and Kailasa) and three keyboard layouts.

THL Toolbox > Tibetan Scripts, Fonts & Related Issues > Using Tibetan in MacintoshesĬontributor(s): David Germano, Chris Fynn, Chris Walker